You’ll Be Missed, Whore
Women who have numerous sexual partners are not whores, they’re sexually independent. At least that’s what the whores tell us. Men who have numerous sexual partners are not whores, they’re just men. That is also from the Book of Whore but is usually cited as a complaint rather than a defense.
By definition, a whore is someone who engages in promiscuous sex. These women (and men) choose to have promiscuous sex but then don’t like being labeled a whore for doing so. I guess it’s the negative connotation that has been associated with the word that sets their fury ablaze. To ease their tempers, they come up with pretty new phrase to justify their actions. A rose by any other name…
Don’t get me wrong, I have no problem with sexually promiscuous people. Personally, I would like to have as much sex with as many people as possible. Unfortunately, I’m not very good at it. It’s not that I try and fail, I really don’t even try. I’m the ultimate under-achiever. It’s my shtick.
Anyways, my point of this post (which is totally lost in the ramblings above) is that if every person who is sexually independent is not a whore, then who the fuck is anymore? Have whores fallen to the wayside? Is it a case of another dead word? That’s one ceremony I wouldn’t mind attending.
related articles
- Basing Our Future Off the Post Office (December 3rd, 2008)
- People Are Idiots (September 16th, 2008)
- It’s an Emergency! What’s your street address? (May 13th, 2008)
- Earth Hour (March 27th, 2008)
- Is Around the Clock News Good for Us? (March 20th, 2008)
July 20th, 2007 at 7:21 am
What do you invision the ceremony to include that creates this interest in your attending it?
July 20th, 2007 at 9:55 am
A bunch of whores being there.
July 24th, 2007 at 7:25 pm
Please stop using “anyways;” it makes you sound like an inane drone.
July 24th, 2007 at 7:28 pm
According to many, I am an inane drone. An inane drone repeating the White House / Hannity / Boortz talking points.
July 24th, 2007 at 7:28 pm
And by “many,” I mean one.