Why is the term “Boycott” not Sexist?
Everyone panic! The liberals intend to boycott the sponsors of Fox News Channel!
Gasp!
Me, worried? Nah… As if liberals can afford the products marketed to Republicans anyways. After all, the Democrats have been telling us for years that Republicans are nothing more than sniveling rich cry-babies. Good luck dumbasses…
related articles
- Basing Our Future Off the Post Office (December 3rd, 2008)
- People Are Idiots (September 16th, 2008)
- It’s an Emergency! What’s your street address? (May 13th, 2008)
- Earth Hour (March 27th, 2008)
- Is Around the Clock News Good for Us? (March 20th, 2008)
July 31st, 2007 at 3:10 pm
Charles Boycott
July 31st, 2007 at 4:53 pm
I almost forgot:
http://boycottliberalism.com/
July 31st, 2007 at 5:03 pm
Aside from the fact that they still call themselves a ‘News’ organization, I don’t really have a problem with Fox.
July 31st, 2007 at 6:44 pm
Dude, you’re so right. No rich liberals anywhere.
Oh, well maybe just the top 5 wealthiest senators. And some dude named Jobs.
July 31st, 2007 at 8:58 pm
Kind of my point…